Blog

  • Disability Needs To Be Part Of Curriculum At The School Level, Say Experts

    Despite policy promises and growing awareness, the gap between the idea of inclusive education and its ground reality remains wide in India. Educationists at NDTV Conclave underscored the urgency of creating learning environments that not only accommodate but actively support every child, regardless of ability or learning style.

    “An inclusive school is not one that simply admits children with diverse needs – it is one that embeds diversity, acceptance, and thoughtful planning right into its blueprint,” said Neelanjana Das Majumdar, Head of Additional Learning Support at Pathways School, Noida. Highlighting the school’s approach, she added, “When children come in, we assess their strengths and identify areas we can nurture. It’s about creating a learner profile that supports their growth, not just testing them on fixed parameters.”Das Majumdar also emphasised the importance of early intervention – often overlooked. “We have children coming in as early as three months. We focus on developmental milestones that are frequently neglected in early years. Our classrooms centre on sensory play, collaborative play, independent play – not marksheets or grades. Parents come with expectations rooted in grades, but we focus on nurturing, not evaluating.”For Nipun Malhotra, disability rights activist and founder of the Nipman Foundation, the path to inclusivity was filled with personal struggles. Born with a disability, Mr Malhotra recalled the early years of rejection and isolation in mainstream schools. “My mother made it her mission to give me an inclusive life,” he said. “There were people who suggested homeschooling or special schools, but her logic was clear – if I don’t face the real world in school, how will I manage life after that?”

    After multiple rejections, Mr Malhotra was finally admitted to a school in Mumbai when he was in Class 4. “Even then, there were two types of teachers – those who treated me with sympathy, which isolated me from peers, and others who ignored me entirely. That damaged my confidence deeply. My only friend during school was my mother. It was only in college that I made my first real friend.”GK Mahantesh, founder of Samarthanam Trust for the Disabled, painted a broader picture of systemic exclusion in Indian schools. “Most institutions are inaccessible – physically, pedagogically, and in terms of communication. Teachers aren’t trained, special educators are few, and parents are often unaware of opportunities,” he said.

    He said Samarthanam Trust works with over 500 government schools, 1,000 colleges, and 100 universities to build accessibility through infrastructure, awareness and engagement. “We encourage simple modifications – reasonable accommodations – and try to get school heads to engage with the issue directly. At Samarthanam, we’ve built step-free campuses, promoted cricket for the blind, and used music and dance to push conversations on inclusion.”The panellists agreed that inclusion is not a favour or a charity – it is a fundamental shift in perspective. True inclusion is when systems evolve to meet every child where they are – not expect them to fit in.

  • Students Happy With CBSE’s Twice-Yearly Board Exam Decision: Dharmendra Pradhan

    In a bid to create a stress-free learning environment, the Union Education Minister, Dharmendra Pradhan, announced that the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) will conduct Class 10 board examinations twice a year from 2026. 

    Speaking on Tuesday at the NDTV Education Conclave, the minister said that “this move aims to mitigate exam-related stress among students and is a key step towards implementing the National Education Policy (NEP). By allowing students to appear for exams twice, similar to the JEE Main format, they will have the flexibility to choose the better score.”The feedback I’ve received indicates students are happy with the decision to hold board exams twice a year,” Union Minister Dharmendra Pradhan said.

    “This initiative aims to alleviate academic stress by providing students with an opportunity to improve their scores without the pressure of a single high-stakes exam. The move aligns with the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020, which emphasises a flexible and student-centric approach to education,” the Union Minister added.Meanwhile, during the NDTV Education Conclave, the minister further said that in the first year of Modi 3.0, India has made notable progress in the education sector, with a strong focus on infrastructure, inclusivity, and modernisation.

    “Education has always been a key pillar and major attraction for India’s youth,” he said.

    Highlighting the significance of futuristic education while preserving traditional foundations, the Union Minister emphasised that the National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has emerged as a visionary framework, shaping the future of learning in India.

    “The National Education Policy (NEP) 2020 has emerged as a visionary framework, shaping the future of learning in the country. With nearly 30 crore students between the ages of 5 and 23, India’s education reforms hold immense significance. The NEP aims to blend traditional values with futuristic goals, with technology at its core,” he saidEncouragingly, its impact is now showing positive results. The National Education Policy (NEP) is effectively balancing tradition and innovation, nurturing strong roots while preparing students for the future.”

  • CBSE Allows Basic Math Students To Study Standard Math In Class 11

    In a significant shift, the Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has allowed students who studied Basic Mathematics (241) in Class 10 to opt for Mathematics Standard (041) in Class 11, starting from the academic year 2025-26. This initiative offers greater flexibility to students in shaping their academic path, provided they meet certain conditions.

    The decision, announced in an official notification dated May 27, 2025, marks a shift from the earlier rule where only students who had taken Mathematics Standard (041) in Class 10 were permitted to continue with the subject at the senior secondary level. Students with Basic Math were previously limited to choosing Applied Mathematics in Class 11.According to the circular, heads of schools must assess and ensure that students who wish to switch from Basic Math to core Mathematics in Class 11 have the necessary aptitude and academic preparedness to handle the subject’s rigour. The Board has instructed schools to communicate the change to parents and students so they can make informed subject choices while filling the List of Candidates (LOC). Once subjects are finalised in LOC, no modifications will be permitted.According to the circular, heads of schools must assess and ensure that students who wish to switch from Basic Math to core Mathematics in Class 11 have the necessary aptitude and academic preparedness to handle the subject’s rigour. The Board has instructed schools to communicate the change to parents and students so they can make informed subject choices while filling the List of Candidates (LOC). Once subjects are finalised in LOC, no modifications will be permitted.

    This relaxation is a continuation of temporary exemptions introduced during the pandemic years, when students who opted for Basic Math were allowed to take Mathematics (041) in higher classes. However, the CBSE has clarified that the current decision will remain valid only until a new scheme of studies is introduced under the National Curriculum Framework for School Education (NCF-SE). Until then, other provisions of the earlier circular issued on January 10, 2019, will continue to apply.The dual-level Mathematics system was introduced by CBSE in the 2019-20 academic session to offer students options based on their interest and future academic plans. While Mathematics (Standard) caters to those wish to pursue the subject in higher studies, Mathematics (Basic) is designed for those who do not wish to continue with it beyond Class 10.
     

  • As American Dreams Fade, How Asia Is Challenging US Supremacy In Education

    Amidst this, universities in Asia are taking proactive steps to support these displaced students. On Friday, Hong Kong Education Secretary Christine Choi called on universities in the Chinese city to welcome “outstanding students from all over the world”.Amid escalating tensions between the Trump administration and Ivy League universities, the US government had revoked the university’s ability to enrol foreign students. The crackdown comes as a part of scrutiny of foreign students and to penalise universities not complying with federal policies and ideologies.

    However, US District Judge Allison Burroughs extended an order blocking the Trump administration from barring Harvard University from enrolling foreign students. It had already been paused since last week when the judge had issued a temporary restraining order.This back and forth has caught 6,800 international students in its crosshairs and has caused an impediment in their academic journey as they face visa uncertainty and potential deportation. Moreover, life has been on standby for these students who are still trying to figure out the way forward, whether to transfer to another American university to save their visas or wait till the matter clears up at Harvard.

    Amidst this, universities in Asia are taking proactive steps to support these displaced students. On Friday, Hong Kong Education Secretary Christine Choi called on universities in the Chinese city to welcome “outstanding students from all over the world”. In an effort to better career prospects and retain global talent, Hong Kong has also introduced policies allowing full-time international undergraduates to take part-time jobs without restrictions.As American Dreams Fade, How Asia Is Challenging US Supremacy In Education

    As American Dreams Fade, How Asia Is Challenging US Supremacy In Education

    The Trump administration’s crackdown on foreign students has led to uncertainty for 6,800 affected students. A judge temporarily blocked the ban on Harvard. Meanwhile, universities in Asia, like HKUST and those in Japan, are welcoming displaced students.

    Amid escalating tensions between the Trump administration and Ivy League universities, the US government had revoked the university’s ability to enrol foreign students. The crackdown comes as a part of scrutiny of foreign students and to penalise universities not complying with federal policies and ideologies.

    However, US District Judge Allison Burroughs extended an order blocking the Trump administration from barring Harvard University from enrolling foreign students. It had already been paused since last week when the judge had issued a temporary restraining order.

    This back and forth has caught 6,800 international students in its crosshairs and has caused an impediment in their academic journey as they face visa uncertainty and potential deportation. Moreover, life has been on standby for these students who are still trying to figure out the way forward, whether to transfer to another American university to save their visas or wait till the matter clears up at Harvard.

    Amidst this, universities in Asia are taking proactive steps to support these displaced students. On Friday, Hong Kong Education Secretary Christine Choi called on universities in the Chinese city to welcome “outstanding students from all over the world”. In an effort to better career prospects and retain global talent, Hong Kong has also introduced policies allowing full-time international undergraduates to take part-time jobs without restrictions.

    Hong Kong University of Science and Technology on Friday invited international students enrolled at Harvard, as well as anyone with offers to attend the elite school, to continue their studies at HKUST.

    “HKUST is extending this opportunity to ensure talented students can pursue their educational goals without disruption,” it said in a statement.

    Other universities have also followed through and taken steps to assist foreign students currently in limbo in the US. 

    Japan’s Ministry of Education, led by Minister Toshiko Abe has officially encouraged domestic universities to admit students affected by the Trump administration, focussing on resuming education for those who were forced to pause their studies, per a report by the Times of India.Tokyo and Kyoto Universities have begun responding already. The former has options for temporary enrolment for displaced students, and they are also providing visa assistance and academic support. Kyoto University is planning to take in researchers who have been impacted by the crackdown. Its International Undergraduate Program (iUP), offers financial aid such as tuition waivers and monthly stipends. It is a 4.5 year program.

    As political dynamics change, Asia is stepping up to redefine the study-abroad landscape and to make a mark on it, reiterating and positioning itself as an upcoming and leading destination for higher education.

  • How Trump Administration Targeting Chinese Students Was Years In The Making

    The United States plans to “aggressively” revoke visas for Chinese students did not happen in a day. US President Donald Trump and his allies had been laying the groundwork for this since years.The United States’ plans to “aggressively” revoke visas for Chinese students did not happen in a day. US President Donald Trump and his allies had been laying the groundwork for this since years.

    In 2023, in a campaign trail, Trump vowed to ban “Christian-hating communists, Marxists and socialists” from the country, shut down China-funded Confucius Institutes on U.S. college campuses and even prosecute Chinese scientific researchers and professors working at US universities. How Trump Administration Targeting Chinese Students Was Years In The Making

    The United States plans to “aggressively” revoke visas for Chinese students did not happen in a day

    Quick Read

    Summary is AI generated, newsroom reviewed.

    The U.S. plans to revoke visas for Chinese students, citing security concerns related to the Chinese Communist Party. This policy, backed by Trump allies, aims to curb China’s influence in U.S. education and has worsened already strained U.S.-China relations.

    The United States’ plans to “aggressively” revoke visas for Chinese students did not happen in a day. US President Donald Trump and his allies had been laying the groundwork for this since years.

    In 2023, in a campaign trail, Trump vowed to ban “Christian-hating communists, Marxists and socialists” from the country, shut down China-funded Confucius Institutes on U.S. college campuses and even prosecute Chinese scientific researchers and professors working at US universities. 

    “The president laid it out there in the campaign… when he says he’s going to do something in the campaign, he actually tries to do it,” said Ken Cuccinelli, who was Trump’s deputy of Homeland Security during his first term, per a report by the Politico.

    “The reason people like me raised it in the first term is the reason you’re hearing from Rubio — there are very real security reasons to not help the Chinese advance their position in technical fields, and certainly not anyone more closely associated with [the Chinese Communist Party].”

    The administration has China hawks who have been focussed on cracking down China’s influence on US institutions.

    About 277,000 Chinese students studied in the US last year, and Marco Rubio, Secretary of State has vowed to “aggressively revoke” the visas and said that they will focus on people with connections to the Chinese Communist Party or those studying sensitive subjects.“The Secretary made this decision in the administration’s ongoing effort to protect our homeland from espionage and other hostile actions,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement.

    China has condemned the policy and termed it “unreasonable”, one that “damaged the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese students and disrupted the normal cultural exchanges between the two countries.” The policy further complicated ties between the countries which are already battling strained ties since Trump put a 145 per cent tariff on Chinese goods but ultimately reduced it to 30 per cent after a temporary agreement with China. Similarly China also reduced the tariffs on the US from 125 percent to 10 per cent.This week the US curbed critical US technology sales to China, including software that is used to make semiconductors. 

    The visa revocations for Chinese students comes as the initial step in removing Chinese influence from the United States. Trump allies hope the next target will be funding for universities working with Chinese grad students. 

    Moreover, US immigration law bars members of the Communist Party from becoming naturalised citizens or green card holders, however, these rules do not apply to people in the United States on student or tourist visas. 

    “Those who come to enjoy our country must love our country,” Trump said. “We’re going to keep foreign, Christian-hating communists, Marxists and socialists out of America.”Legislation to limit Chinese nationals from obtaining visas for STEM-related studies had been introduced as early as 2020 by Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) He applauded the administration’s decision in a statement, saying “China’s use of students to spy on political dissidents and American researchers is a well-documented national security threat.”

    Rubio too had introduced a bill in 2021 targeting Chinese nationals in 2021. He pressured local colleges to shut down their Confucius Institutes when he represented Florida in the US Senate. He said in 2022, vocally opposing China, saying that it “is the most formidable near-peer adversary our nation has ever faced.”

  • “These Visa Policies Will Reduce The Number Of International Students In The US”

    The global recognition and perceived quality of international degrees have consistently motivated students to pursue education abroad. Over time, the number of Indian students studying abroad has steadily increased, with the United States alone recording a high of over 300,000 Indian students. However, the application process for studying in any foreign country involves several challenges, particularly obtaining a visa, which depends on various factors such as interviews and the justification for choosing a specific course. Recently, the U.S. has introduced changes to its visa interview process.

    NDTV’s Ambika Singh Kahma speaks to Pragati Imam, a career counsellor and the founder of CollegeEdge, a boutique firm in Kolkata on how the F-1 visa policies have changed, what other countries students can choose to pursue their career and what are some of the alternative options students can take to secure an F-1 visa:The most significant recent change is a temporary halt on scheduling new F-1 visa interviews at U.S. consulates worldwide as the U.S. government expands social media vetting for international student applicants. Existing appointments will proceed, but no new ones will be scheduled until further notice. 

    Additionally, F-1 visa holders are now restricted from participating in study abroad programs longer than five months, even if they remain enrolled at their U.S. institution – a change from previous practice.

    There are new expanded screening measures in place. All student visa applicants are now subject to enhanced social media vetting, which includes consular officers reviewing applicants’ social media posts. This expansion is part of a broader effort to increase national security and monitor political activity. Earlier also applicants have had to disclose their social media details, but the current review is more intensive.If your U.S. visa is rejected, you can reapply or consider top options abroad like Canada, the UK, Ireland, the EU, or Singapore. But don’t overlook India, which now boasts some of the best undergraduate programs in the world with strong industry connections, global exposure, and impressive placement records.Yes, students can pursue online courses or certifications from many U.S. universities. However, these do not grant the same campus experience or post-study work benefits as in-person programs, and some programs may have restrictions on international enrollment. But online credentials can still enhance your academic profile and career prospects.Visa issues like delays or denials may force students to defer admission, lose scholarships, or miss program start dates. The uncertainty and perceived risk of visa denial will also discourage academically talented students from even attempting to apply to U.S. institutions. Additionally, universities with curricula emphasizing international exposure must now reconsider or restructure such programs and this will reduce students’ access to global learning experiences.

  • Hello world!

    Welcome to WordPress. This is your first post. Edit or delete it, then start writing!